next up previous
Next: Solitons by Inverting Up: Beams whose Intensity Previous: Example 3. Parallel

Example 4. Light guiding light

Because beams of a nonlinear medium create their own optical waveguide, strong (`pump') beams can guide weak (`signal') beams of a different wavelength [19]. Indeed, guiding light with light is a subject of recent activity [3][14] and is also the physical explanation for a class of mathematical results about the coexistence of dark and bright solitons [34]. In this section, we characterize the waveguide seen by the signal.

First, we emphasize that the effective refractive index induced by a monochromatic beam is not uniquely defined. For example, consider the usual Kerr (cubic) nonlinearity which, in general, exhibits induced birefringence [16,17].

Under one interpretation, the refractive index induced by elliptically polarized light) can be viewed as a circularly birefringent medium [28] as discussed above in Example 2. The amount of birefringence depends on the material as is reflected through the parameters and the relative strengths of the two circular components. An alternative interpretation is that of a medium with normal (or linear) birefringence, but whose optical axes twist with propagation. The period of twist is , where and are the propagation constants of the two circularly polarized components that comprise the polarization of the (dynamic) soliton discussed in Example 2. If the pump beam is linearly polarized, the induced birefringent waveguide is axially uniform. If it is circularly polarized, the induced waveguide is isotropic.

The refractive index of this twisted birefringent medium is characterized by its optical axes which are aligned with the major , and minor, , components of the polarization ellipse, where and where and . When B=0, the medium is isotropic.

If the beam is linearly polarized, say , then and . Thus, the refractive index `seen' in the direction of polarization is larger than in the orthogonal direction.

It turns out that the twisted birefringent interpretation of the induced refractive index is the one that is necessary for light guiding light. Consider now the waveguide `seen' by a small (signal) beam in the presence of a large (pump) self guided beam.

The wavelengths of the signal and pump differ. In this case, the induced refractive index is uniquely defined. Two extreme limits exist for the waveguide seen by signal depending on the response time of the dipoles to the difference in frequencies of the pump and signal.

The case of a `fast' material response is discussed in [16]. For example, the signal `sees' an double that seen by the pump for materials whose induced refractive index is isotropic (B=0).

If the material response is `slow', the signal `sees' only the time averaged pump intensity. Consequently, the signal `sees' the same induced waveguide as the pump, i.e. a (linear) waveguide composed of the twisted birefringent medium discussed above. The propagation characteristics of such waveguides are available in the literature [35].

Consider the special case of a pump beam that is a linearly polarized one-dimensional soliton of a Kerr medium. The waveguide induced by this beam is characterized by , where with , the maximum and minimum refractive index. If the weak (signal) beam is polarized in the direction of the strong soliton (pump) beam, then it `sees' a waveguide characterized by , where and are respectively the wavelength of the pump and signal.

If the signal is polarized orthogonal to the pump beam, then it sees a waveguide characterized by .

The special case when the signal and pump are the same wavelength, but orthogonally polarized, is discussed in Example 2 above.



next up previous
Next: Solitons by Inverting Up: Beams whose Intensity Previous: Example 3. Parallel



James Ashton
Tue Feb 13 16:17:04 EST 1996